EMCDDA Best Practice Promotion in Europe: an Internet based dissemination tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.18Keywords:
EMCDDA, best practice, web-based dissemination, evidence, decision makingAbstract
Best practice is the best application of available evidence to current activities in the drugs field. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) created a web-based tool aimed at bridging together scientific evidence and current practices in the drug addiction field. Beyond dissemination of evidence, the scope is to share best practice among the European countries. The synthesis of the evidence is based on the methods of the Cochrane collaboration (the Drugs and Alcohol Group) and the Grade working group. As of February 2013 the portal encompasses four modules on the effectiveness of demand reduction interventions, a collection of European projects on prevention, treatment, harm reduction and social reintegration and an inventory of European Guidelines and Standards including a bank of instruments to evaluate interventions (http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/bestpractice). The summaries of evidence are presented in a plain language format and include brief explanation of the measures of effect supporting the evidence, but do not provide specific recommendations. The main future challenge of EMCDDA’s best practice promotion is to become a service for those willing to implement best practice. The Best Practice Portal should become a platform where to find all is needed for successful implementation (handbooks, training materials, guidelines for evaluation and contacts for mentoring).References
Banzi, R., Liberati, A., Moschetti, I., Tagliabue, L., & Moja, L. (2010). A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12, 26. doi:10.2196/jmir.1288
Banzi, R., Moja, L., Pistotti, V., Facchini, A., & Liberati, A. (2011a). Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research: an overview of reviews. Health Research Policy and System, 9, 26. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-26
Banzi, R., Cinquini, M., Liberati, A., Moschetti, I., Pecoraro, V. Tagliabue, L., & Moja, L. (2011b). Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: prospective cohort analysis. British Medical Journal, 343, d5856. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5856.
Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C. R., Vale, L., … Donaldson, C. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies’. Health Technology Assessment, 8, 6 (Downloadable from http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon806.pdf).
Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist G., Kunz R., Falck-Ytter Y., Alonso-Coello P., …, & the GRADE Working Group, (2008). Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 336, 924-926. dpi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.


