Anchor heuristics effect on heavy drinking in young people: Behavior economics perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1902Keywords:
Anchoring heuristics, behavior economics, prices, heavy drinking.Abstract
There is a need for theory-based approaches to reduce heavy drinking in youths. Anchoring is a process in which people make estimates by starting from an initial value that is adjusted to yield a final answer. In this study, we determined the effectiveness of anchoring heuristics in estimating the price of a bottle of alcohol and its effect on heavy drinking in young people. In a sample of 327 young people in Mexico, participants completed a survey on alcohol drinking and anchoring heuristics. We found that when the anchor was shown and the participants were explicitly directed to the anchor value, the mean estimates of the price reported by the participants increased, indicating that the participants were pulled up toward the anchor. Anchoring effects were found to affect on the willingness of the alcohol consumers to pay. In this context, alcohol prices (anchor condition) were higher for heavy drinking. We discuss the implications of our results and future directions for research on anchoring effects in heavy drinking. We concluded that anchoring provides novel insights into the consequences of anchoring effects in alcohol drinking.References
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G. y Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73-106. doi:10.1162/00335530360535153.
Aston, E. R. y Cassidy, R. N. (2019). Behavioral economic demand assessments in the ad-dictions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 30, 42-47. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.016.
Ayyagari, P., Deb, P., Fletcher, J., Gallo, W. y Sindelar, J. L. (2013). Understanding heteroge-neity in price elasticities in the demand for alcohol for older individuals: Heterogeneous responses to alcohol prices. Health Economics, 22, 89–105. doi:10.1002/hec.1817.
Berthet, V., Autissier, D. y de Gardelle, V. (2022). Individual differences in decision-making: A test of a one-factor model of rationality. Personality and Individual Differences, 189, 111485. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111485.
Bickel, W. K., Green, L. y Vuchinich, R. E. (1995). Behavioral economics. Journal of the Ex-perimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 257–262. doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.64-257.
Brzozowicz, M. y Krawczyk, M. (2022). Anchors on prices of consumer goods only hold when decisions are hypothetical. PloS One, 17, 1-23. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0262130.
Byrnes, J., Shakeshaft, A., Petrie, D. y Doran, C. (2013). Can harms associated with high-intensity drinking be reduced by increasing the price of alcohol? Price and alcohol con-sumption patterns. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 27–30. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00482.x.
Cruz-Soto, M., Palacios, J., Lopez, P. y Villagomez, M. (2019). Descripción del consumo de alcohol en habitantes de la comunidad de La Solana en el estado de Querétaro, México. Revista Nthe, 26, 7-17. Recuperado de http://nthe.mx/detalleArt.php?id=104.
Epley, N. y Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00372.
Epley, N. y Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjust-ments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311-318. doi:10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2006.01704.x.
Epley, N. y Gilovich, T. (2010). Anchoring unbound. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 20-24. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.005.
Furnham, A. y Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-economics, 40, 35-42. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008.
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psycho-logy. Psychological review, 98, 254. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.254.
Green, D., Jacowitz, K. E., Kahneman, D. y McFadden, D. (1998). Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Econo-mics, 20, 85-116. doi:10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00031-6.
Heckley, G., Jarl, J. y Gerdtham, U.-G. (2017). Frequency and intensity of alcohol consum-ption: New evidence from Sweden. The European Journal of Health Economics: HEPAC: Health Economics in Prevention and Care, 18, 495–517. doi:10.1007/s10198-016-0805-2.
Jacowitz, K. E. y Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Perso-nality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161–1166. doi:10.1177/01461672952111004.
Jung, M. H., Perfecto, H. y Nelson, L. D. (2016). Anchoring in payment: Evaluating a judg-mental heuristic in field experimental settings. Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 354-368. doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0238.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449-1475. doi:10.1257/000282803322655392.
Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Re-view, 103, 582–591. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582.
Lynch, J. G. y Ariely, D. (2000). Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, qua-lity, and distribution. Marketing Science, 19, 83-103. doi:10.1287/mksc.19.1.83.15183.
MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Acker, J., Gray, J. C., Brown, C. L., Murphy, J. G.,… Sweet, L. H. (2014). The neuroeconomics of alcohol demand: An initial investigation of the neural co-rrelates of alcohol cost–benefit decision making in heavy drinking men. Neuropsychop-harmacology, 39, 1988-1995. doi:10.1038/npp.201.
MacKillop, J. y Murphy, J. G. (2007). A behavioral economic measure of demand for al-cohol predicts brief intervention outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 89, 227-233. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.01.002.
Mackillop, J., Murphy, J. G., Tidey, J. W., Kahler, C. W., Ray, L. A. y Bickel, W. K. (2009). La-tent structure of facets of alcohol reinforcement from a behavioral economic demand cur-ve. Psychopharmacology, 203, 33–40. doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1367-5.
Morrell, M. N., Reed, D. D. y Martinetti, M. P. (2021). The behavioral economics of the bottomless cup: The effects of alcohol cup price on consumption in college students. Expe-rimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29, 36–47. doi:10.1037/pha0000360.
Murphy, J. G., Correia, C. J. y Barnett, N. P. (2007). Behavioral economic approaches to reduce college student drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2573-2585. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.015.
Palacios, J. (2018). Interplay between sensation seeking and risky alcohol drinking in Mexi-can adolescents: An structural modeling equation approach. International Journal of Psychological Research, 11, 19–26. doi:10.21500/20112084.3332.
Palacios, J. (2019). Predictors of personality and self-efficacy of sexual risk behavior in Mexican adolescents. Annals of Psychology, 35, 131- 139. doi:10.6018/analesps.35.1.319471.
Palacios, J. (2021). Evidencias de validez y confiabilidad de la escala de flexibilidad en jó-venes mexicanos. Persona, 24, 27-45. doi:10.26439/persona2021.n024(1).5311.
Palacios, J. y González, Z. (2020). Incidencia de motivos para consumir alcohol involucra-dos en su ingesta en habitantes de la zona Bajío de México. Health and Addictions, 20, 70-80. doi:10.21134/haaj.v20i2.501.
Reséndiz, E., Bustos, M., Mujica, R., Soto, I., Cañas, V., Fleiz, C.,... Villatoro, J. (2018). Na-tional trends in alcohol consumption in Mexico: Results of the National survey on drug, alcohol and tobacco consumption 2016-2017. Salud Mental, 41, 7–16. doi:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2018.003.
Secretaría de Salud (2011). Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en Materia de Investi-gación para la Salud; 2011. Recuperado de http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/rlgsmis.html.
Shan, L., Diao, H. y Wu, L. (2020). Influence of the framing effect, anchoring effect, and knowledge on consumers’ attitude and purchase intention of organic food. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02022.
Shrestha, V. (2015). Estimating the price elasticity of demand for different levels of al-cohol consumption among young adults. American Journal of Health Economics, 1, 224–254. doi:10.1162/ajhe_a_00013.
Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Wagenaar, A. C., Salois, M. J. y Komro, K. A. (2009). Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: A meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction, 104, 179–190. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02438.x.
