DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.437Palabras clave:
Resumen
Citas
Anderson, K. (1998). Internet dependency among college
students: should beconcerned?. Poster presentado en el encuentro de la American College Personnel Association, St. Louis, M.O.
Anderson, T.K., Law, S.A. y Mitchell, B.M. (1995). Universal
access to E-mail: Feasability and Societal implication. Santa Mónica (CA): Rand Corporation.
Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computerr use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addcition: the first
days of the internet usage survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 883-898.
Davis, S.F., Smith, B., Rodrigue, K. y Pulvers, K. (1999). An
examination of Internet usage on two college campuses. College Student Journal, 33, 2, 257-260.
De Santis, J. y Youniss, J. (1991). Family contributions to
adolescent´s attitudes toward new tecnology. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6, 410-422.
Echeburúa, E., Amor, P. y Cenea, R. (1998). Adicción a Internet:
¿una nueva adicción psicológica?. Monografías de Psiquiatría, 2, 38-44.
Estudio General de Medios: datos sobre Internet [EGM]. (1999) [Online]. Disponible: http://www.aimc.es/aimc/html/inter/net.html
FIND/SVP(1997). The 1997 American Internet User Survey.
[Online]. Disponible: http://etrg.finsvp.com/findf/html
Griffits, M.D. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLII. Some comments on addictive use of the internet by Young. Psychological Reports, 80, 81-82.
King, J.L. y y Kraemer, K.L. (1995). Information infraestructure,
national policy, and global competitiveness. Information Infraestructure and Policy, 4, 5-28.
Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J. y Kiesler,
S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 55-63.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay,
T. y Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
McKenna, K. (1997). Dell identifies new generation without
age and gender separation. Newsbites News Network. [Online]. Disponible: http://www.newsbytes.com
McKenna, K. y Bargh, J. (1998). Coming out in the age of
the Internet: identity demarginalization throught virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (3), 681-694.
Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females and the Internet.
En J. Gackenback, Psychology and the Internet. San Diego: Academic Press.
Morahan-Martin, J. y Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and
correlatesof pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13-29.
National Center for Educational Statistics [NCES] (1999).
Condition of Education. [Online]. Disponible: http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=199902
NielsenNetRatings (1999). How many Online? [Online]. Disponible: http://www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_ online/n_america.html
Parks, M. y Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace.
Journal of Communication, 46 (1), 80-97.
Sherman, R.C., End, C., Kraan, E., Cole, A., Campbell, J.,
Birchmeier, Z. y Klausner, J. (2000). The Internet gender gap among college estudent: Forgotten but not gone?. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3 (5), 885-894.
Schumaher, P. y Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet
and computer attitudes and experiencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95-110.
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the Net
generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Young, K.S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a
new clinical dosiorder. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 1 (3), 237-244.



