Discriminative capacity for functional impairment of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form in patients with substance use disorder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1357Keywords:
Personality, DSM-5, PID-5, Functional impairment, Dual pathologyAbstract
The evaluation of comorbid personality disorders in consumer patients is of special relevance in the clinical setting. This work analyzes the discriminative capacity of the PID-5 Personality Inventory to detect functional deterioration in a group of patients with SUD. In addition, the use of a functional and a normative criterion is compared to establishing the cut-off points that represent pathological functioning in the facets defined in the Alternative Personality Model DSM-5.178 patients with SUD attending addiction outpatient treatment centers completed the PID-5 and the World Health Organization's Assessment of Disability questionnaire (WHODAS 2.0).The analysis of ROC curves using as a criterion of moderate to severe disability a score greater than 25 on the WHODAS shows AUC values between .50 and .78. 6 non-discriminatory capacity facets of functional disability: attention seeking, grandiosity, avoidance of intimacy, manipulation, restricted affectivity and rigid perfectionism. The cut-off points obtained using the functional criteria are higher in all the faces that are discriminative of functional deterioration with respect to those proposed using normative criteria.The PID-5 has a good discriminative capacity for dysfunctionality implemented by WHODAS 2.0 in most facets, especially in the facets linked to the negative affectivity domain. Considered globally, the use of normative criteria is possibly more suitable for population epidemiological studies, while functional criteria could be more useful in clinical samples.References
Alarcón, R. D. (2010). Hacia nuevos sistemas de diagnóstico: proceso, preguntas y dilemas. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 3, 37-39. doi:10.1016/j.rpsm.2009.07.001.
Díaz-Batanero, C., Ramírez-López, J., Domínguez-Salas, S., Fernández-Calderón, F. y Lozano, Ó. M. (2019). Personality inventory for DSM-5–short form (PID-5-SF): Reliability, factorial structure, and relationship with functional impairment in dual diagnosis patients. Assessment, 26, 853-866.
Gutiérrez, F., Aluja, A., Peri, J. M., Calvo, N., Ferrer, M., Baillés, E.,... Krueger, R. F. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Spanish PID-5 in a clinical and a community sample. Assessment, 24, 326-336. doi:10.1177/1073191115606518.
Keeley, J. W., Flanagan, E. H. y McCluskey, D. L. (2014). Functional impairment and the DSM-5 dimensional system for personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 657-674. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_133.
Krueger, R. F. y Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 Personality Trait Model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477-501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732.
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D. y Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674.
Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Thomas, K. M. y Ruggero, C. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 20, 353-361. doi:10.1177/1073191113486182.
Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Rehm, J., Kennedy, C., Epping-Jordan, J.,... Pull, C. (2010). Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 815-823. doi:10.2471/blt.09.067231.
Van Den Bosch, L. M. y Verheul, R. (2007). Patients with addiction and personality disorder: Treatment outcomes and clinical implications. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20, 67-71. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e328011740c.
Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E. y Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312-326. doi:10.1177/1073191113485810.


