Psychometric properties of the Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB) in substance use disorder: Marital and parental relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1821Keywords:
validation, family relationships, marital relationship, parenting, substance use disorderAbstract
Family therapy stands out among the main psychotherapeutic treatments for substance use disorder. Nonetheless, we should point out a deficit of psychometric instruments for family evaluation, specifically validated for this disorder in Spanish population. It is necessary to have questionnaires available to evaluate family dynamics, commencing with the quantification of the marital relationship and the parenting exercise which result in design-suitable interventions. The present study aims to validate and determine the clinical applicability of the Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB; in English, Basic Family Relations Assessment Questionnaire) in substance use disorder. One hundred and fifty-two couples of Spanish nationality (N = 304 participants) with a child suffering from substance use disorder completed the CERFB as well as other means of family evaluation. The results of the CFA presented the validity of the two-factor structure model of the CERFB of the original version within the general Spanish population. The results of the invariance factor across sex allowed us to assume the configural invariance between the groups. However, the metric invariance based on the sex could not be assumed. The validity evidence based on relations to other variables determined significant correlations between the CERFB and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Parental Bonding Instrument. The reliability of both scales was satisfactory: Marital (α = .93; ω = .93) and Parental (α = .82; ω = .81) Normative data are provided. The CERFB is the first instrument to come about which is validated within the clinical Spanish population and which evaluates the family within substance use disorder.References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association y National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales DSM-5 (5ª ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
Ballús-Creus, C. (1991). Adaptació del Parental Bonding Instrument a la població barcelonesa [Tesis de maestría]. Escola Professional de Psicologia Clínica de Barcelona.
Barbaranelli, C. (2007). Analisi dei dati. Tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicologica e sociale. LED Edizioni Universitarie.
Bellon-Champel, L. y Varescon, I. (2017). Environnement familial et consommation de substances psychoactives à l’adolescence: Facteurs de vulnérabilité et d’adaptation. Annales Médico-psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique,175(4), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2015.06.005
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N. y Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8
Browne, M. W. y Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. A. Bollen y J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.136-162). Sage.
Campreciós, M. (2016). Validación y aplicabilidad clínica del Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB) en los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria [Tesis doctoral, Universitat Ramon Llull]. Repositorio Cooperativo TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa). http://hdl.handle.net/10803/352474
Campreciós, M., Vilaregut, A., Callea, A. y Mercadal, L. (2020). Clinical applicability of the Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB) in eating disorders: Marital and parental relationships in traditional family structures. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 48(5), 191-199.
Campreciós, M., Vilaregut, A., Virgili, C., Mercadal, L. e Ibáñez, N. (2014). Relaciones familiares básicas en familias con un hijo con trastorno de la conducta alimentaria. Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology, 44(3), 311-326.
Cancrini, L. (1982). Quei temerari sulle macchine volanti. Studio sulle terapie dei tossicomani. La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
Cancrini, L. y La Rosa, C. (1991). Il vaso di Pandora. Manuale di psichiatria e psicopatología. La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
Cancrini, L., Cingolani, S., Compagnoni, F., Costantini, D. y Mazzoni, S. (1988). Juvenile drug addiction: A typology of heroin addicts and their families. Family Process, 27(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00261.x
Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 863-882.
Cheung, G. W. y Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cócola, F. (2018). Funcionamiento familiar y abordaje de los trastornos por el uso de sustancias: Una revisión de la literatura sistémica. Redes, Revista de Psicoterapia Relacional e Intervenciones Sociales, 38, 47-64.
Costa, D., González, M. L., del Arca, D., Masjuan, N. y Olson, D. H. (2013). Propiedades psicométricas del FACES IV: Estudio de validez en población uruguaya. Ciencias Psicológicas, 7(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v7i1.1053
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Czeisler, M. É., Lane, R. I., Petrosky, E., Wiley, J. F., Christensen, A., Njai, R., Weaver, M. D., Robbins, R., Facer-Childs, E. R., Barger, L. K., Czeisler, C. A., Howard, M. E. y Rajaratnam, S. M. W. (2020). Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, June 24–30, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(32), 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1
Degenhardt, L., Bucello, C., Mathers, B., Briegleb, C., Ali, H., Hickman, M. y McLaren, J. (2011). Mortality among regular or dependent users of heroin and other opioids: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Addiction, 106(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x
Dubey, M. J., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Biswas, P., Chatterjee, S. y Dubey, S. (2020). COVID-19 and addiction. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(5), 817-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.008
Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (1992). Técnicas de evaluación ambiental. En R. Fernández- Ballesteros (Ed.), Introducción a la evaluación psicológica (T. II. pp. 443-472). Pirámide.
Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (1993). La evaluación psicológica en sus contextos de aplicación. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 14(2), 97-115.
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S. y John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93
Granello, D. H. y Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(4), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00325.x
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. y Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6ª ed.). Pearson Education.
Hibberts, M., Johnson, R. B. y Hudson, K. (2012). Common survey sampling techniques. En L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 53-74). Springer.
Hu, L.-T. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hunter, L. (2012). Challenging the reported disadvantages of E-questionnaires and addressing methodological issues of online data collection. Nurse Researcher, 20(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.09.20.1.11.c9303
Ibáñez, N. (2016). Validación del Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB) [Tesis doctoral, Universitat Ramon Llull]. Repositorio Cooperativo TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa). http://hdl.handle.net/10803/350314
Ibáñez, N., Linares, J. L., Vilaregut, A., Virgili, C. y Campreciós, M. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB). Psicothema, 24(3), 489-494.
Keszei, A. P., Novak, M. y Streiner, D. L. (2010). Introduction to health measurement scales. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(4), 319-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3ª ed.). Guilford Press.
Lebow, J. L. (2015). Editorial: Relational diagnosis-an idea whose time has come. Family Process, 54(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12141
Linares, J. L. (1996). Identidad y Narrativa. La terapia familiar en la práctica clínica. Paidós Ibérica.
Linares, J. L. (2002). Del abuso y otros desmanes. El maltrato familiar, entre la terapia y el control. Paidós Ibérica.
Linares, J. L. (2012). Terapia familiar ultramoderna. La inteligencia terapéutica. Herder Editorial.
Mantel, N. y Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22(4), 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/22.4.719
Marel, C., Mills, K. L. y Teesson, M. (2021). Substance use, mental disorders and COVID-19: A volatile mix. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 34(4), 351-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000707
Martínez-Pampliega, A., Iraurgi, I., Galíndez, E. y Sanz, M. (2006). Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES): Desarrollo de una versión de 20 ítems en español. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6(2), 317-338.
Martinotti, G., Alessi, M. C., Di Natale, C., Sociali, A., Ceci, F., Lucidi, L., Picutti, E., Di Carlo, F., Corbo, M., Vellante, F., Fiori, F., Tourjansky, G., Catalano, G., Carenti, M. L., Incerti, C. C., Bartoletti, L., Barlati, S., Romeo, V. M., Verrastro, V.,… di Giannantonio, M. (2020). Psychopathological burden and quality of life in substance users during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Italy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.572245
Mathers, B. M., Degenhardt, L., Bucello, C., Lemon, J., Wiessing, L. y Hickman, M. (2013). Mortality among people who inject drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(2), 102-123. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.108282
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Miguel-Arias, D., Pereiro, C., Bermejo, A. M., López de Abajo, B. y Sobrido, M. (2016). Mortalidad por reacción aguda tras consumo de drogas en Galicia: 1997-2011. Adicciones, 28(2), 80-89.
Ministerio de Sanidad. (2022). Estrategia de Salud Mental del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Periodo 2022-2026. https://www.consaludmental.org/publicaciones/Estrategia-Salud-Mental-2022-2026.pdf
Mollà, L., Günther, C., Vilaregut, A., Campreciós, M. y Matalí, J. L. (2020). Instruments for the assessment of coparenting: A Systematic review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(9), 2487-2506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01769-3
Mollà, L., Vilaregut, A., Callea, A., Roca, M., Pretel, T. y Matalí, J. L. (2022). Questionnaire for the Assessment of Coparenting (CECOP): Development and Validation [Manuscrito presentado para su publicación]. Departamento de Psiquiatría y Psicología Infantil y Juvenil, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Grupo de Investigación en Salud Mental Infanto-Juvenil, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu. Departamento de Psicología, FPCEE Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull. Departamento de Ciencias Humanas, LUMSA Università.
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P. y Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2018). Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide (Third Edition). https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-edition/preface
Observatorio Español de las Drogas y las Adicciones. (2021). Informe 2021. Alcohol, Tabaco y Drogas Ilegales en España. Ministerio de Sanidad. Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas. https://pnsd.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/sistemasInformacion/informesEstadisticas/pdf/2021OEDA-INFORME.pdf
Parker, G., Tupling, H. y Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x
Pedroza, D. Y., Taborda, D. P. y Varela, J. (2020). Consumo de sustancias psicoactivas desde la perspectiva de la terapia familiar. Poiésis, 39, 53-74. https://doi.org/10.21501/16920945.3752
Rial, A., Varela, J., Abalo, J. y Lévy, J. P. (2006). El análisis factorial confirmatorio. En J. P. Lévy (Dir.), Modelización con Estructuras de Covarianzas en Ciencias Sociales. Temas Esenciales, Avanzados y Aportaciones Especiales (pp. 119- 143). Netbiblo.
Sanz, M., Iraurgi, I. y Martínez-Pampliega, A. (2002). Evaluación del funcionamiento familiar en toxicomanías: Adaptación española y características de adecuación métrica del FAP-FACES IV. En I. Iraurgi y F. González-Saiz (Eds.), Instrumentos de Evaluación en drogodependencias (pp. 403-434). Aula Médica.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
Spanier, G. B. (2017). DAS. Escala de Ajuste Diádico. (R. Martín-Lanas, A. Cano-Prous y M. I. Beunza-Nuin, adaptadores). TEA Ediciones. (Trabajo original publicado en 1976).
Staccini, L., Tomba, E., Grandi, S. y Keitner, G. I. (2015). The evaluation of family functioning by the Family Assessment Device: A systematic review of studies in adult clinical populations. Family Process, 54(1), 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12098
Vandenberg, R. J. y Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
Waal, H. y Gossop, M. (2014). Making sense of differing overdose mortality: Contributions to improved understanding of European patterns. European Addiction Research, 20(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346781
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191- 2194. https://doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Worthington, R. L. y Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research. A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
