Core research areas on addiction in Spain through the Web of Science bibliographic coupling analysis (2000-2013)

Authors

  • Gregorio González-Alcaide Departamento de Historia de la Ciencia y Documentación, Universitat de València
  • Amador Calafat European Institute of Studies on Prevention (IREFREA), Palma de Mallorca
  • Elisardo Becoña European Institute of Studies on Prevention (IREFREA), Palma de Mallorca; Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.20

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, addiction, research areas, bibliographic coupling, intellectual structure.

Abstract

The present study identifies the main Spanish core research areas in the area of addictions through the bibliographic coupling analysis of the publications at the Web of Science under the substance abuse heading. The bibliographic coupling methodology is the analytical procedure that determines the thematic-intellectual proximity of the documents under consideration through the identification of the shared or simultaneously cited bibliography by those documents. A factor analysis and network analysis have been carried out to cluster documents, graphically represent the existing core research areas, and analyse the interrelations between them. We have identified 30 core research areas. Alcohol is the topic of attention of 17 areas and cocaine has a strong presence in 6. Heroin and opiates are only present as prominent substances in 4 areas and cannabis and tobacco in other two for each substance. It has been found that there is a significant degree of fragmentation in the area, with the existence of numerous research foci but with few connections with each other and few documents showing shared common knowledge. Also noteworthy is the large number of emerging research areas, reflecting an incipient stage in many of the research topics. Consideration must be placed in promoting scientific consensus and cohesion of the discipline as well as to encouraging the consolidation of main lines that respond to the social problems and research challenges.

References

Arbinaga, F. (2002). Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Adicciones (1996-2000). Adicciones, 14, 139-144.

Arciniega, L. T. y Miller, W. R. (1997). Where to publish? Some considerations among English-language addiction journals. Addiction, 92: 1639-1648. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02883.x.

Boyack, K. W. y Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2389-2404. doi: 10.1002/asi.21419.

Boyack, K. W. y Klavans, R. (2014). Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of Science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 670-685. doi: 10.1002/asi.22990.

Calafat, A. (2006). The invisible college of non-English addiction journals. Addiction, 101, 638-645. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01466.x.

Culebras-Fernández, J., García de Lorenzo, A., Wanden-Nerghe, C., David Castiel, L. y Sanz-Valero, J. (2008). ¡Cuidado!, sus referencias bibliográficas pueden ser estudiadas. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 23, 85-88.

De Granda-Orive, J. I., Villanueva Serrano, S., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Alonso-Arroyo, A., García-Río, F.,… González-Alcaide, G. (2009). Redes de colaboración científica internacional en tabaquismo: análisis de coautorías mediante el Science Citation Index durante el periodo 1999-2003. Gaceta Sanitaria, 23, 222e34–43.

Echeburúa, E. y Corral, P. (2010). Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías y a las redes sociales en jóvenes: un nuevo reto. Adicciones, 22, 91-96.

García López, J. A. (1999). Bibliometric analysis of Spanish scientific publications on tobacco use during the period 1970-1996. European Journal of Epidemiology, 15, 23-28.

Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: a new dimension in Documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108-111. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl189.

Glänzel, W. y Czerwon, H. J. (1995). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. En: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 167-176). Chicago: ISSI.

Glänzel, W. y Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37, 195-221. doi: 10.1007/BF02093621.

Glänzel, W. y Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labeling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91, 399-416. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7.

González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Alonso-Arroyo, A., De Granda, J. I. y Villanueva Serrano, S. (2006). Redes de coautoría y colaboración de las instituciones españolas en la producción científica sobre drogodependencias en biomedicina 1999–2004. Trastornos Adictivos, 8, 78-114.

González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Navarro Molina, C., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Bolaños Pizarro, M. y Aleixandre Benavent, R. (2007). Análisis de género de la producción científica española sobre drogodependencias en biomedicina 1999-2004. Adicciones, 19, 45-50.

González-Alcaide, G., Castellano-Gómez, M., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. y Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2008a). Literatura científica de autores españoles sobre análisis de citas y Factor de Impacto en Biomedicina (1981-2005). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 31, 344-365. doi:10.3989/redc.2008.v31.i3.433.

González-Alcaide, G., Bolaños-Pizarro, M., Navarro Molina, C., De Granda-Orive, J. I., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. y Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2008b). Análisis de la producción científica española sobre abuso de sustancias en función de la colaboración entre disciplinas. Adicciones, 20, 337-346.

González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. y Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2012). Análisis del proceso de internacionalización de la investigación española en ciencia y tecnología (1980-2007). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35, 94-118. doi:10.3989/redc.2012.1.847.

Guardiola, E., Sánchez-Carbonell, X., Beranuy, M. y Bellés, A. (2006). La producción científica española sobre dependencia de drogas en el contexto de la Unión Europea: 1976-2000. Adicciones, 18, 119-133.

Huang, M. H y Chang, C. P. (2014). Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window. Scientometrics, 98, 1721-1744. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1126-1.

Jarneving, B. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research. Scientometrics, 50, 365-389. doi: 10.1023/A:1010546312154.

Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65, 245-263.

Jarneving, B. (2007a). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 287-307. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004.

Jarneving, B. (2007b). Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of cognitive cores on the field level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 338-356. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.08.001.

Jarneving, B. (2013). The impact of core documents: a citation analysis of the 2003 Science Citation Index core-document population. En: Proceedings of the ISSI 2013 Viena. 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Viena, Austria, 15th to 19th July 2013 (pp. 955-965). Viena, Austria: Austrian Institute of Technology.

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25. doi: 10.1002/asi.5090140103.

Kuusi, O. y Meyer, M. (2007). Anticipating technological breakthroughs: using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm. Scientometrics, 70, 759-777. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-0311-5.

Liu, M. (1993). Progress in Documentation. The complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49, 370-408. doi: 10.1108/eb026920.

Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C. y Braithwaite, J. (2012). Network structure and the role of key players in a translational cancer research network: a study protocol. BMJ Open, 2, e001434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001434.

MacRoberts, M. H. y MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36, 435-344. doi: 10.1007/BF02129604.

Meyer, M., Libaers, D., Thijs, B., Grant, K., Glänzel, W. y Debackere, K. (2014). Origin and Emergence of Entrepreneurship as a Research Field. Scientometrics, 98, 473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1021-9.

Nicolaisen, J. y Frandsen, T. F. (2012). Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling. Journal of Informetrics, 6, 276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.001.

Osca Lluch, J. (2012). Productividad y colaboración científica desde una perspectiva de género en la Revista Española de Drogodependencias. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 37, 9-21.

Porcel Torrens, A., Castellano-Gómez, M., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Aleixandre-Benavent, A. y Choren, S. (2003). Análisis de citas en la revista Adicciones. Adicciones, 15, 309-319.

Sánchez-Carbonell, X., Guardiola, E., Bellés, A. y Beranuy, M. (2005). European Union scientific production on alcohol and drug misuse (1976–2000). Addiction, 100, 1166-1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01135.x.

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406.

Small, H. (2009). Critical thresholds for co-citation clusters and emergence of the giant component. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.001.

Upham, S. P. y Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83, 15-38. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9.

Vogel, R. y Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in Strategic Management: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 426-446. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12000.

Youtie, J., Kay, L. y Melkers, J. (2013). Bibliographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment. Research Evaluation, 22, 145-156. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvt002.

Yuan, Y., Gretzel, U. y Tseng, Y. H. (2014). Revealing the nature of contemporary tourism research: Extracting common subject areas through bibliographic coupling. International Journal of Tourism Research. En prensa. doi: 10.1002/jtr.2004.

Published

2014-06-15

Issue

Section

Originals