The influence of personal networks on the use and abuse of alcohol and drugs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.204Keywords:
network, friends, use of alcohol, use of drugs, peer influence, Europe, nightlife, recreational useAbstract
Party networks of young people are very important for socialization, but can also influence their involvement in risk behaviours or they can be protective. The influence of nightlife network of friends in using alcohol/ drugs is investigated through a survey. We explore the individual-centred networks (7.360 friends) of 1.363 recreational nightlife users in 9 European cities in 2006, through 22 friend characteristics. Statistical analysis utilised factorial analysis with varimax rotation and analysis of variance. The 69% of the sample had been drunk during the last month and more than half of them had used illicit drugs. Most of the respondents use to have a stable group of friends with whom to go out. Network’s main characteristics were being more or less deviant and/or prosocial. Having not network or a less prosocial network is related to be low consumers. Having a non deviant, but prosocial network is related to being a person who gets drunk without using illegal drugs. Users of illegal drugs have a deviant and prosocial network. Finally ex users have less deviant networks, but at the same time a helper and prosocial network. Males drug use patterns appear to be less affected by the characteristics of their networks. Some preventive consequences coming from these results are already known as the importance of having less deviant friends. But some other issues are less known: to enhance certain prosocial skills may have counter preventive effects among recreational users and to influence the network for preventative purposes may be more effective among females.References
Abel, G., Plumridge, L., & Graham, P. (2002). Peers, networks or
relationships: Strategies for understanding social dynamics as determinants of smoking behaviour. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 9, 325-338.
Alexander, C., Piazza, M., Mekos, D., & Valente, T. (2001). Peer networks
and adolescent cigarette smoking: An analysis of the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 22–30.
Bauman, K.E., & Ennett, S.T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence
for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91, 185-198.
Calafat, A., Juan, M., Becoña, E., & Mantecón, A. (2008). Qué drogas se
prefieren para las relaciones sexuales en contextos recreativos. Adicciones, 20, 37-48.
Dishion, T., Andrews, T., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their
friends in early adolescent. Relationship characteristics, quality and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139-151
Dorsey, A.M., Scherer, C.W., & Real, K, (1999). The college tradition
of “Drink ‘til you drop”: The relation between students’ social networks and engaging in risky behaviors. Health Communication, 11, 313-334.
Ennett, S.T., & Bauman K.E. (1993). Peer group structure and adolescent
cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. Journal Health Social Behavior, 34, 226-236.
Ennett, S.T., Faris, R., Hipp, J., Foshee, V.A., Bauman, J.E., Hussong, A., &
Cai, L. (2008). Peer smoking, other peer attributes, and adolescent
cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. Prevention Science,9, 88-98.
Evans, W.P., & Skager, R. (1992). Academically successful drug users:
an oxymoron? Journal Drug Education, 22, 353-365.
Giordano, P.C. (2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of
Sociology,29 :257-281.
Grandfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press.
Heckathorn, D. (2002). Respondent-Driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid
Population Estimates from Chain-Referral Samples of Hidden Populations”. Social Problems, 49, 11-34.
Kandel, D. (1973). Adolescent marihuana use: role of parents and peers.
Science, 181, 1067-70. Kandel, D. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science, 190, 912-914.
Kandel, D. (1978). Homophily, selection and socialization in adolescent
friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
Kandel, D. (1980). Developmental stages in adolescent drug involvement.
In NIDA Research Monographs, 30, 120-127.
Kirke, D.M. (2004). Chain reactions in adolescents’ cigarette, alcohol
and drug use: Similarity through peer influence or the patterning of ties in peer networks? Social Networks, 26, 3-28.
Hugues, K., Bellis, M., Whelan, G., Calafat, A., Juan, M., & Blay, N. (2009).
Alcohol, drugs, sex and violence: health risks and consequences
in young British holidaymakers to the Balearics. Adicciones, 21, 265-278.
Latkin C.A., Knowlton A.R., Hoover D., & Mandell W. (1999). Drug network characteristics as a predictor of cessation of drug use among adult injection drug uses: A prospective study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 463–473.
Leonard, K.E., Kearns, J., & Mudar, P. (2000). Peer networks among
heavy, regular and infrequent drinkers prior to marriage. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 669-673.
Mantecón, A., Juan, M., Calafat, A., Becoña, E., & Román E. (2008).
Respondent-Driven Sampling: un nuevo método de muestreo para el estudio de poblaciones visibles y ocultas. Adicciones, 20, 161-170.
Pearson, M., & Michell, L. (2000). Smoke rings: Social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking, and drug-taking, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7, 21-37.
Reifman, A. (2004). A renaissance in social network research. Dialogue:
The Official Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 27.
Reifman, A., Watson, W.K., & McCourt, A. (2006). Social Networks and
College Drinking: Probing Processes of Social Influences and Selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 820-832.
Rethinam, V., & Reifman, A. (2002). Does closeness to parents and
peers regulate college student’s modelling of their drinking? Poster presentation at the 9th Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, April 2002, New Orleans, LA. Web site: http://www.depts.ttu.edu/hs/research/reifman/sra2002.htm
Rogers, E., & Cartano, D. (1962). Methods of measuring opinion leadership. Public Opinion Quarterly,26, :435– 441.
Ross, M.W., Mattison, A.M., & Franklin, D.R. (2003). Club drugs and
sex on drugs are associated with different motivations for gay circuit party attendance in men. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 1173-1183.
Tani, C.R., Chavez, E.L., & Deffenbacher, J.L. (2001). Peer isolation and
drug use among White non-Hispanic and Mexican-American adolescents. Adolescence, 36, 127–139.
Thorlindsson, T., & Bernburg, J.G. (2006). Peer groups and substance use: examining the direct and interactive effect of leisure activity. Adolescence, 41, 321-329.
Valente, T.W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks
to understand and prevent substance use: a transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use and Misuse, 39, 1685–1712.
Valente, T.W., Ritt-Olson, A., Stacy, A., Unger, J.B., Okamoto, J., &
Sussman, S. (2007). Peer acceleration: effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction, 102, 1804-1815.
Vidal-Infer, A., Tomás-Dols, S., Aguilar-Moya, R., Samper-Gras, T., Zarza, M., & Aguilar-Serrano, J. (2009). Christmas work dinners. A pattern of recreational use of alcohol and other drugs? Adicciones, 21, 133-142.
Wang, J., Carlson, R.G., Falck, R.S., Siegal, H.A., Rahman, A., & Li, L.
(2005) Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 78, 147–157.
Wang, M.Q, Fitzhugh, E.C., Turner, L., & Fu, Q. (1997). Social influence
on southern adolescents’ smoking transition: a retrospective study. Southern Medicine Journal, 90, 218 –222.
