Immunotherapies for Drug Addictions

Authors

  • Iván D. Montoya Clinical Director, Pharmacotherapies and Medical Consequences Grants National Institute on Drug Abuse Bethesda, Maryland. U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.274

Keywords:

immunotherapy, vaccine, drug abuse, treatment, cocaine, nicotine

Abstract

Immunotherapies in the form of vaccines (active immunization) or monoclonal antibodies (passive immunization) appear safe and a promising treatment approaches for some substance-related disorders. The mechanism of action of the antibody therapy is by preventing the rapid entry of drugs of abuse into the central nervous system. In theory, immunotherapies could have several clinical applications. Monoclonal antibodies may be useful to treat drug overdoses and prevent the neurotoxic effects of drugs by blocking the access of drugs to the brain. Vaccines may help to prevent the development of addiction, initiate drug abstinence in those already addicted to drugs, or prevent drug use relapse by reducing the pharmacological effects and rewarding properties of the drugs of abuse on the brain. Passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies has been investigated for cocaine, methamphetamine, nicotine, and phencyclidine (PCP). Active immunization with vaccines has been studied for cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine. These immunotherapies seem promising therapeutic tools and are at different stages in their development before they can be approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of substance-related disorders. The purpose of this article is to review the current immunotherapy approaches with emphasis on the risks and benefits for the treatment of these disorders.

References

Vocci F, Ling W. Medications development: successes and challenges. Pharmacol.Ther. 2005; 108: 94-108.

Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General--executive summary. Nicotine.Tob. Res. 2000; 2: 379-395.

McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 2000; 284: 1689-1695.

Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Swanson JM, Telang F. Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results of imaging studies and treatment implications. Arch. Neurol. 2007; 64: 1575-1579.

Kosten T, Owens SM. Immunotherapy for the treatment of drug abuse. Pharmacol.Ther. 2005; 108: 76-85.

Bonese KF, Wainer BH, Fitch FW, Rothberg RM, Schuster CR. Changes in heroin self-administration by a rhesus monkey after morphine immunisation. Nature 1974; 252: 708-710.

Bradbury MW, Lightman SL. The blood-brain interface. Eye 1990; 4 ( Pt 2): 249-254.

Owens SM. Antibodies as pharmacokinetic and metabolic modifiers of neurotoxicity. NIDA Res.Monogr 1997; 173: 259-272.

Hatsukami DK, Rennard S, Jorenby D, Fiore M, Koopmeiners J, de Vos A, Horwith G, Pentel PR. Safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine in current smokers. Clin.Pharmacol.Ther. 2005; 78:

-467.

Kosten TR. Future of anti-addiction vaccines. Stud. Health Technol.Inform. 2005; 118:177-185.

Elkashef A, Biswas J, Acri JB, Vocci F. Biotechnology and the treatment of addictive disorders: new opportunities. BioDrugs. 2007; 21:.259-267.

Orson FM, Kinsey BM, Singh RA, Wu Y, Gardner T, Kosten TR. The future of vaccines in the management of addictive disorders. Curr.Psychiatry Rep. 2007; 9:381-387.

Nabi Biopharmaceuticals. Website: www.nabi.com. Consulted on February 26, 2008.14. LeSage MG, Keyler DE, Hieda Y, Collins G, Burroughs D, Le C, Pentel PR. Effects of a nicotine conjugate vaccine on the acquisition and maintenance of nicotine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006; 184:.409-416.

Pentel P, Malin D. A vaccine for nicotine dependence: targeting the drug rather than the brain. Respiration 2002; 69:.193-197.

Published

2008-09-01

Issue

Section

Editorial