Methadone Treatment Programme users perception of the accessibility and care received from the therapeutic teams

Authors

  • Joan Carles March Cerdá Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Área de Investigación.
  • Eva Martín-Ruiz Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Área de Investigación. Enviar correspondencia a: Eva Martín Ruiz. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Campus Universitario de Cartuja s/n. Apdo. Correos 2070. 18080 GRANADA (España). Tfno: (+34 958 027 529). Fax: +34 958 027 503
  • Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Área de Investigación.
  • Ana Rivadeneira Sicilia Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Área de Investigación.
  • Carmen Rodríguez Reinado Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Área de Investigación.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.332

Keywords:

Methadone, Opiate Addiction Treatment, Qualitative methodology, Patients, Patients / MT relationship

Abstract

Background: This study explores the type of care and the therapeutic treatment provided at drug treatment centres located in two Spanish cities, as perceived by methadone treatment (MT) users. It provides key aspects to improve the ability of MT programmes to prevent relapses and premature discharges from treatment, and to facilitate users’ social reintegration. Methods: Exploratory qualitative study based on semistructured interviews among 30 MT programme users in the cities of Barcelona and Granada. Results: The care provided by therapeutic teams relies on 3 main intervention areas: medical, psychological and social care. The central role attributed to the physicians in users’ discourses reflects the relevance assigned to the methadone and to its medical prescription. Almost 60% of users had visited their prescribing doctor at least once in the previous three months, 22% their psychologist, and only 6% their social worker. Users interviewed mentioned the absence of a comprehensive and individualized assessment of their social integration, the lack of resources adapted to their individual needs (housing, employment, training and basic needs), and the lack of family implication where they felt that psychologists and social workers could play a much more relevant role than at present. Conclusions: Despite the generally positive outcomes of the MT, its main limitation lies in the lack of a comprehensive approach to users’ individual needs. Strengthening biopsychosocial intervention emerges as an essential prerequisite to progress towards users’ rehabilitation and reinsertion.

References

Markez I, Póo M. Drogodependencias: reducción de daños y riesgo. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Observatorio Vasco de Drogodependencias. Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco, 2000.

EMCDDA. Reviewing current practice in drug-substitution

treatment in the European Union. Luxemburg: 2000.

Plan Nacional sobre Drogas. Tipos de programas de atención al drogodependiente y de reducción del daño. Disponible en: http://www.pnsd.msc.es/Categoria3/prevenci/areaAsistencia/tipologia.htm. Último acceso abril de 2006.

Dole VP,.Nyswander M. A medical treatment for diacetylmorphine (heroin) addiction. A clinical trial with methadone hydrochloride. JAMA 1965; 193: 646-50.

Dole VP,.Nyswander ME. Methadone maintenance treatment. A ten-year perspective. JAMA 1976; 235: 2117-9.

Farrell M, Ward J, Mattick R, Hall W, Stimson GV, des Jarlais D et al. Methadone maintenance treatment in opiate dependence: a review. BMJ 1994; 309: 997-1001.

Ball JC, Ross A. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: patient, programs, services and outcomes. New York: Springer- Verlag, 1991.

Lehmann F, Lauzon P, Amsel R. Methadone maintenance: predictors of outcome in a Canadian milieu. J Subst Abuse Treat 1993; 10: 85-9.

Caplehorn JR, McNeil DR, Kleinbaum DG. Clinic policy and retention in methadone maintenance. Int J Addict 1993; 28: 73-89.

Caplehorn JR, Dalton MS, Cluff MC, Petrenas AM. Retention in methadone maintenance and heroin addicts’ risk of death. Addiction 1994; 89: 203-9.

Abdul-Quarter AS FS,.Des Jarlais D MMMRBS. Methadone maintenance and behaviour by intravenous drug users that can transmit HIV. Contemporary Drug Problems 1987; 14: 425-34.

Schoenbaum EE, Hartel D, Selwyn PA, Klein RS, Davenny K, Rogers M et al. Risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus infection in intravenous drug users. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 874-9.

Novick DM, Joseph H, Croxson TS, Salsitz EA, Wang G, Richman BL et al. Absence of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus in long-term, socially rehabilitated methadone maintenance patients. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 97-9.

Marsch LA. The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behavior and criminality: a meta-analysis. Addiction 1998; 93: 515-32.

Fernandez Miranda JJ. [Methadone maintenance programs effectiveness. An outcome evaluation studies review]. Med Clin (Barc) 2001; 116: 150-4.

Seidenger A, Honegger U. Metadona, heroína y otros opioides: manual para un tratamiento ambulatorio de mantenimiento con opioides. Madrid: Díaz de Santos, 2000.

Brands B et al. Literature review. Methadone Maintenance Treatment. Otawa, ON: Health Canada, 2002.

Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S, Ferri M, Mayet S. Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD004147.

Amato L, Davoli M, Ferri M, Gowing L, Perucci CA. Effectiveness of interventions on opiate withdrawal treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 73: 219-26.

Domingo-Salvany A. [Methadone maintenance treatment in Spain. Analysis of active centres in 1997]. In: Paper Presented at VI Encuentro Nacional sobre Drogodependencias y su Enfoque Comunitario, Chiclana de la Frontera (Cadiz), Spain. 1997.

Verster A, Buning E. Manual de Formación: aspectos clave del tratamiento sustitutivo para la dependencia de opiáceos. 2003. Netherlands, Directorio G de la Salud Pública de la Comisión Europea, proyecto: SPC.2002267.

Trujols J, Pérez de los Cobos J. La perspectiva de los usuarios sobre los tratamientos de mantenimiento con metadona: una revisión centrada en la satisfacción con el tratamiento. Adicciones 2005; 17: 281-75.

Vignau J,.Brunelle E. Differences between general practitioner- and addiction centre- prescribed buprenorphine substitution therapy in France. Preliminary results. Eur Addict Res 1998; 4 Suppl 1: 24-8.

Sell L, Zador D. Patients prescribed injectable heroin or methadone -their opinions and experiences of treatment. Addiction 2004; 99: 442-9.

Perez de los Cobos J, Fidel G, Escuder G, Haro G, Sanchez N, Pascual C et al. A satisfaction survey of opioiddependent

clients at methadone treatment centres in Spain. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 73: 307-13.

Strang J, Marsden J, Cummins M, Farrell M, Finch E, Gossop M et al. Randomized trial of supervised injectable versus oral methadone maintenance: report of feasibility and 6-month outcome. Addiction 2000; 95:1631-45.

Fischer B, Chin AT, Kuo I, Kirst M, Vlahov D. Canadian illicit opiate users’ views on methadone and other opiate prescription treatment: an exploratory qualitative study. Subst Use Misuse 2002; 37: 495-522.

Torrens M, San L, Martinez A, Castillo C, Domingo-Salvany A, Alonso J. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile for measuring health status of patients in methadone maintenance treatment. Addiction 1997; 92:707-16.

Perez de Los Cobos J, Trujols J, Valderrama JC, Valero S, Puig T. Patient perspectives on methadone maintenance treatment in the Valencia Region: dose adjustment, participation in dosage regulation, and satisfaction with treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 79: 405-12.

Mitchell TB, White JM, Somogyi AA, Bochner F. Slowrelease oral morphine versus methadone: a crossover comparison of patient outcomes and acceptability as maintenance pharmacotherapies for opioid dependence. Addiction 2004; 99: 940-5.

White JM, Danz C, Kneebone J, La Vincente SF, Newcombe DA, Ali RL. Relationship between LAAMmethadone preference and treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 66: 295-301.

Fountain J, Strang J, Griffiths P, Powis B, Gossop M. Measuring met and unmet need of drug misusers: integration of quantitative and qualitative data. Eur Addict Res 2000; 6: 97-103.

Neale J. Drug users’ view of prescribed methadone. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy 1998; 5: 33-45.

Ball JC, Graff H, Sheehan JJ Jr. The heroin addicts’ view of methadone maintenance. Br J Addict Alcohol Other Drugs 1974; 69: 89-95.

Markez I, Iraurgi I, Póo M. Programas de mantenimiento con metadona en el País Vasco: dispositivos específicos y oficinas de farmacia. Trastornos adictivos 2002; 4: 171-80.

Fiellin DA, O’Connor PG. New federal initiatives to enhance the medical treatment of opioid dependence. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 688-92.

van den Brink W,.van Ree JM. Pharmacological treatments for heroin and cocaine addiction. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 13: 476-87.

Kreek MJ,.Vocci FJ. History and current status of opioid maintenance treatments: blending conference session. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23: 93-105.

Prieto L. Más allá de los métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos: el método científico. Revisiones en Salud Pública 1997; 5: 95-9.

Zeithaml V. Calidad total en la gestión de servicios. Madrid: Díaz de Santos, 1993.

Ward J MRHW. How long is enough? answers to questions about the duration of methadone maintenance treatment. In Ward RP MRHW, ed. Methadone maintenance treatment and other opioid replacement therapies, Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1998.

Secades Villa R,.Fernández Hermida JR. Cómo mejorar las tasas de retención en los tratamientos de drogodependencias. Adicciones 2000; 12: 353-63.

Ball AL, Rana S, Dehne KL. HIV prevention among injecting drug users: responses in developing and transitional countries. Public Health Rep 1998; 113 Suppl1:170-81.

Kidorf M, Hollander JR, King VL, Brooner RK. Increasing employment of opioid dependent outpatients: an intensive behavioral intervention. Drug Alcohol Depend 1998; 50: 73-80.

March JC, Oviedo-Joekes E, Romero M. Injection and non-injection drug use related to social exclusion indicators in two Andalusian cities. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy 2005; 12: 437-47.

March JC, Oviedo-Joekes E, Romero M. Drugs and social exclusion in ten European cities. Eur Addict Res 2006; 12: 33-41.

Platt JJ. Vocational rehabilitation of drug abusers. Psychol Bull 1995; 117: 416-33.

Kidorf M, Neufeld K, Brooner RK. Combining steppedcare approaches with behavioral reinforcement to motivate employment in opioid-dependent outpatients. Subst Use Misuse 2004; 39: 2215-38.

Fischer B, Rehm J, Kim G, Kirst M. Eyes wide shut?- a conceptual and empirical critique of methadone maintenance treatment. Eur Addict Res 2005; 11: 1-14.

Published

2006-12-01

Issue

Section

Originals